Чи відповідають виробники ігор?

Hello gamblers... there are too many scam casinos that don't pay out winnings and are passive to casinoguru's complaints.

I think the biggest culprit for this is the game suppliers, when they give the games to these casinos....there should be some morality. Let's start by "cleaning" the casinos that don't have a license.....then the "curacao" scammers.

Hei pelurit....on liian paljon huijari kasinoita jotka ei maksa voittoja ja ovat casinoguru valituksiin passiivisia .

Mielestäni suurin syyllinen tähän on pelien toimittajat , kun antavat pelit näiden kasinoiden käyttöön....joku moraali pitäisi olla. Alkuun päästään kun "siivotaan" kasinot joilla ei ole lisenssiä.....sitten "curacao" huijarit.

Hi, even though I read what you wrote, what is the point of this post? I don't mean this in a bad way or anything, but I'm really interested. 

Do you think that game providers are to blame for some casinos being dishonest and not paying players? I think they probably don't look into it too much because it's a business and if the casino pays for the games, they get them. I haven't thought about whether the game provider has ever refused to give the casino their games. Have you ever encountered that?

Hi!

I empathize; perhaps you had a bad casino session, but still. Try to hold the temper a bit. Such language is not necessary. 🙏

Radka, what do you mean "try to keep your composure"..... wouldn't that be a good criterion for game suppliers.....if the casino doesn't have a license, they won't rent games to them and enable "shadowy business". It would be easy for a casino guru to make a list.....e.g. black points when you exceed a certain limit, you lose your games or when the casino is inactive in responding to complaints. The guru also has to state "the casino does not respond" ... the case is closed, and the casino continues. (Even if it's a business, there must be some morality and rules of the game....this is my opinion)

Radka, mitä tarkoitat " yritä pitää malttia"..... eikö se olisi hyvä kriteeri pelientoimittajille.....jos kasinolla ei ole lisenssiä niin pelejä ei niille vuokrata ja mahdollisteta "hämärä bisnestä". Listaus olisi casinogurunkin helppo tehdä.....esim. mustat pisteet kun ylittää tietyn rajan niin pelit pois tai kun kasino on passiivinen vastaamaan valituksiin. Gurukin joutuu vain toteamaan "kasino ei vastaa" ...tapaus suljettu, ja kasino jatkaa. (Vaikka olisi bisnestä niin joku moraali ja pelisäännöt pitää olla....tämä on minun mielipiteeni )

Hi there,

I have no idea what you mean by "try to keep your composure". I did not respond to you in this thread, but to the other person. Could this be the source of your question?

Frankly, it is not that simple when it comes to so-called fake games. The "list" actually confirms that many unlicensed casinos do not provide what you call fake games despite being unlicensed completely.

Thus, it is not evidence.

I'd say you should ask this question to the game providers. From my perspective, even an unlicensed casino may be popular and quite fair, meaning it generates a profit, so someone will provide its products to these sites. It is just a business decision like any other.

Moreover, to me, it seems you see as a regulator, which is not accurate. We hold no power over casino games or casinos. Restricting a casino from its games is completely outside our area. Only the game provider as a product owner may change or terminate the contract.

Honestly, I can't say whether I understood your idea correctly, so feel free to explain further.